 -- Part of a 2-Movie 3-Disc Boxed Set -- The discover of an ancient pyramid buried in Antarctica sends a team of scientists and adventurers to the frozen continent. Once there, they make an even more terrifying discovery: two alien races engaged in the ultimate battle. And whoever win... we lose. Storyline: When a private satellite encounters an unidentified source of heat in Antarctica and it is found to be a pyramid buried deep underground , a search team comprising of top-of-the-line archaeologists and engineers is sent to Antarctica to find out more . Once there , the team comes across signs which indicate that the place is inhabited by an unknown alien species . It is not long before the aliens begin to hunt the team members . At the same time , a trio of coming-of-age Predators have arrived to collect the skulls of the aliens as trophies , and the humans are caught between a deadly battle between the two warring species . Written by Soumitra Reviewer's Note: Reviewed by Martin Liebman on December 23, 2007 -- We're in the middle of a war. We need to pick a side. --- I must admit that I really like the concept of a "vs." movie. Taking two or more iconic film characters and letting them loose against one another really works when the story and setting work, not to mention choosing the right icons to go at one another. For example, I really enjoyed Freddy vs. Jason, although I am not really a fan of either individual franchise. The two, while both slasher horror villains, are complete opposites in the way the go about their "business." Freddy is the wisecracking, humorous villain who is tougher than he looks (and only completely effective inside a dream state) while Jason is the large and imposing no nonsense killer who stalks his prey with a cold efficiency. It's possible that a Michael Myers would have worked playing off of Freddy, but a Michael vs. Jason film, for example, could never really work because the two killers are so similar in nature. Throw in a hero, such as Ash from the Evil Dead series with a Freddy and Jason or Michael, and you've got all the fixing for a fabulous "vs" film. So, where does a film like AvP fit in? Pretty well, actually. When compared against the entirety of the Alien and Predator franchises, I'd have to rank it smack dab in the middle. It's better than the final two Alien films and it also surpasses the second Predator movie, but, obviously, fails miserably to compete with the likes of Alien, Aliens, and Predator. Besides Aliens and Predators, Alien vs. Predator stars Lance Henriksen (The Terminator) as Charles Bishop Weyland, multi-billion dollar robotics magnate and inspiration for the "Bishop" series of androids as seen in a couple of the Alien films. It happens that one of his satellites picks up a heat signature from a remote and supposedly desolate island in the antarctic. He assembles a team of fodder, I mean scientists, led by cold weather terrain expert Alexa Woods (Sanna Lathan, "Nip/Tuck"). According to the fodder's findings, this may be the very first pyramid ever built. It combines elements from Cambodian, Aztec, and Egyptian architecture. Once the team manages to get inside, the temple becomes a transformer, and it would probably fit right in on Cybertron but it comes off as a little too much here. We already have two awesome villains to chew the team up. Why turn the temple into a transformer, then? A weak explanation is given, but suffice it to say that as the story moves along, the fodder is killed off one by one by both species, and our heroine will have to "choose a side" in the conflict between Aliens and Predators if she has any notions of leaving the temple without her head exploding from a Predator's laser cannon or her chest bursting open, giving birth to another Alien. So, what's wrong here? We've easily accomplished one of the two primary goals for making a good "vs" film--the Aliens and the Predators are two of Twentieth Century Fox's most iconic villains not part of the Evil Galactic Empire, they both reek of "cool," and they are polar opposites when it comes to how they go about their business. Predators rely mostly on technology to fight while Aliens rely on speed, agility, stealth, and surprise to kill their enemies naturally without artificial weapons. Where the movie ultimately lets audiences down is in the story line. It's a pretty solid one on the whole that mostly makes sense in context with what we know about each species, but it gets a little too unbelievable and convenient the further it moves along towards resolution. I believe the writers tried to throw as many ideas into the concept as possible that not only sum up why the Aliens and Predators are on Earth, but that basically rewrite the entirety of ancient human history as well. It looks like Alien vs. Predator: Requiem the upcoming "sequel," will leave history alone and let the two races square off in a small town, wrecking havoc throughout. Of course, there are also the usual suspects to be held accountable as to why this film fell pretty flat with audiences. The acting, even from Lance Henriksen, is generally uninspired. Most of the cast simply go through the motions, not really caring to turn in a convincing role. Of course, even good acting in a mostly unconvincing and overly developed script for this type of film wouldn't really help matters at all. The CGI blood that is often employed looks pretty bad, and that might be the biggest problem. Unfortunately, the studio would rather make a few more dollars than to give fans what they have come to expect from the Alien and Predator franchises, releasing this film to theaters with a PG-13 rating. This type of movie simply screams for an R rating (and a hard-R at that) but what we get is a dumbed down, more "family friendly" version. Whatever. If you're going to make this movie, then really make it. Don't go 3/4 of the way and stop when the rubber really needs to hit the road. Truth be told, Alien vs. Predator isn't bad way to spend an afternoon in front of the Blu-ray player. It certainly doesn't deliver on the whole, but parts of the film are actually pretty exciting (mostly the Aliens fighting Predators action) and the rest of the movie is just tolerable enough to keep the viewer interested until the next action sequence. The film is pretty slick but I can't help to wonder if allowing it to venture into darker and more grisly territory would have improved on the final product. As for the Blu-ray disc this movie finds itself on, I cannot say I was completely impressed. I'd call it about average, which means it's really good, a noticeable improvement over the DVD version, but problems that seemed obvious and correctable remain, resulting in a disc that cannot be wholly recommended. If you are a serious or casual fan of either or both franchises I think you'll find something to like here, but if you are new to the Alien and Predator franchises, there are three other five-star films waiting for you first. This disc is recommended as a rental and only as a buy if you find a good deal on it. (Based on Comic Book) Cast Notes: Sanaa Lathan (Alexa Woods), Raoul Bova (Sebastian de Rosa), Lance Henriksen (Charles Bishop Weyland), Ewen Bremner (Graeme Miller), Colin Salmon (Maxwell Stafford), Tommy Flanagan (Mark Verheiden), Joseph Rye (Joe Connors), Agathe De La Boulaye (Adele Rousseau), Carsten Norgaard (Rusten Quinn), Sam Troughton (Thomas Parks), Petr Jákl (Stone), Pavel Bezdek (Bass), Kieran Bew (Klaus), Carsten Voigt (Mikkel), Jan Pavel Filipensky (Boris [as Jan Filipensky]). IMDb Rating (10/23/09): 5.4/10 from 56,609 users
 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
